1969 vs BLHWF: Takasago Thermal Engineering Co.,Ltd. vs BELIMO Holding AG
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1969•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,508.00
+0.02%
BL
BLHWF•United States
$778.22
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Takasago Thermal Engineering Co.,Ltd. is 52.4× the market cap of BELIMO Holding AG. BLHWF pays a dividend; 1969 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,508.00 | $778.22 |
| Daily Change | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 59.26% | 18.84% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,683.00 | $1,102.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,854.89 | $777.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $1,060.91 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $1,010.88 |
| Beta | — | 0.98 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $601.06B | $11.48B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $10.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 12.30M |
| Float | — | 12.06M |
| Employees | — | 2,386 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 49.26 |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.49 |
| Price / Sales | — | 10.24 |
| Price / Book | — | 14.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 32.23 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 16.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 18.73% |
| Return on Equity | — | 30.21% |
| Return on Assets | — | 17.72% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 18.88 |
Growth
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 18.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 15.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.08% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 10.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.27 | -1.64 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.79 | -1.53 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.39 | -2.64 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5375 | 0.5285 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #12,348 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1969 | BLHWF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 2027.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 4889.90% |
Compare 1969 to peers
Compare BLHWF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.