1959 vs FER: KRAFTIA CORPORATION vs Ferrovial S.A.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1959•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥9,333.00
+0.23%
FER•Bolsa de Madrid
€60.90
+1.70%
Quick Summary
KRAFTIA CORPORATION is 13.5× the market cap of Ferrovial S.A..
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥9,333.00 | €60.90 |
| Daily Change | 0.23% | 1.70% |
| 1-Year Return | 97.50% | 52.63% |
| 52-Week High | ¥10,565.00 | €63.16 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,740.40 | €40.21 |
| 50-Day MA | — | €58.45 |
| 200-Day MA | — | €53.14 |
| Beta | — | 0.81 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $588.87B | $43.70B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $50.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $9.63B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 717.74M |
| Float | — | 422.73M |
| Employees | — | 22,319 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 50.28 |
| Forward P/E | — | 55.87 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 5.75 |
| Price / Sales | — | 4.54 |
| Price / Book | — | 7.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 25.15 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 9.22% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 12.37% |
| Return on Equity | — | 14.32% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.37% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.21 |
Growth
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 5.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -87.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.01 | 6.55 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.90 | 2.80 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.02 | 3.50 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5947 | 0.6135 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #22,880 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1959 | FER |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3325.40% |
| % Institutions | — | 3735.50% |
Compare 1959 to peers
Compare FER to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.