1952 vs FBOHY: Shin Nippon Air Technologies Co.,Ltd. vs Forbo Holding AG ADR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1952•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,510.00
-0.85%
FBOHY•United States
$20.99
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Shin Nippon Air Technologies Co.,Ltd. is 105.8× the market cap of Forbo Holding AG ADR. FBOHY pays a dividend; 1952 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,510.00 | $20.99 |
| Daily Change | -0.85% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 94.96% | 3.55% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,275.00 | $20.99 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,759.92 | $20.27 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $20.98 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $20.80 |
| Beta | — | 0.80 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $157.39B | $1.49B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.09B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 70.95M |
| Float | — | 874,828 |
| Employees | — | 4,716 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 14.67 |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.72 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.37 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.94 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 6.31 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 6.35% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 8.17% |
| Return on Equity | — | 10.80% |
| Return on Assets | — | 5.58% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.43 |
Growth
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -2.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -24.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.93% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 25.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.74 | 0.44 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.08 | 0.24 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.49 | 0.49 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4958 | 0.5477 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,265 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1952 | FBOHY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 0.00% |
Compare 1952 to peers
Compare FBOHY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.