1951 vs AVHNY: EXEO Group,Inc. vs Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1951•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,809.00
+2.15%
AV
AVHNY•United States
$26.30
+0.00%
Quick Summary
EXEO Group,Inc. is 60.9× the market cap of Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR. AVHNY pays a dividend; 1951 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥2,809.00 | $26.30 |
| Daily Change | 2.15% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 72.82% | 54.71% |
| 52-Week High | ¥2,993.00 | $26.30 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,605.24 | $17.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $26.30 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $20.35 |
| Beta | — | 0.72 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $543.49B | $8.92B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $19.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $5.96B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 326.80M |
| Float | — | 21.12M |
| Employees | — | 24,931 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 13.77 |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.36 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.50 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 11.06 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 9.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 13.07% |
| Return on Equity | — | 11.02% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.24% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.91 |
Growth
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -7.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 23.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 17.49% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 4.60 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 5.15 | 5.25 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.79 | 1.33 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 11.14 | 5.35 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5901 | 0.5432 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #18,591 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1951 | AVHNY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 0.00% |
Compare 1951 to peers
Compare AVHNY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.