1950 vs TCL: NIPPON DENSETSU KOGYO CO.,LTD. vs Transurban Group
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1950•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,935.00
-2.85%
TC
TCL•Australian Securities Exchange
A$13.56
+1.42%
Quick Summary
NIPPON DENSETSU KOGYO CO.,LTD. is 5.0× the market cap of Transurban Group. TCL pays a dividend; 1950 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,935.00 | A$13.56 |
| Daily Change | -2.85% | 1.42% |
| 1-Year Return | 134.78% | -2.16% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,330.00 | A$15.18 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,090.00 | A$13.30 |
| 50-Day MA | — | A$14.02 |
| 200-Day MA | — | A$14.21 |
| Beta | — | 0.51 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $208.39B | $42.09B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $61.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $3.92B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 3.12B |
| Float | — | 3.11B |
| Employees | — | 4,100 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 89.93 |
| Forward P/E | — | 158.73 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.52 |
| Price / Sales | — | 10.74 |
| Price / Book | — | 4.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 25.24 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 12.19% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 35.60% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.36% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.08% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.15 |
Growth
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 8.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 46.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.96% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.67 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 6.72 | -0.56 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.68 | -0.42 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 14.46 | -1.62 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6110 | 0.5679 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #25,016 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1950 | TCL |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 27.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 5984.30% |
Compare 1950 to peers
Compare TCL to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.