1944 vs 601800: KINDEN CORPORATION vs China Communications Construction Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1944•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥7,056.00
-0.80%
60
601800•SHG
CN¥7.50
-1.19%
Quick Summary
KINDEN CORPORATION is 12.2× the market cap of China Communications Construction Co Ltd. 601800 pays a dividend; 1944 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥7,056.00 | CN¥7.50 |
| Daily Change | -0.80% | -1.19% |
| 1-Year Return | 105.22% | -19.44% |
| 52-Week High | ¥8,488.00 | CN¥10.33 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥3,381.93 | CN¥7.50 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥7.94 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥8.58 |
| Beta | — | 0.52 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.48T | $121.70B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $559.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $726.64B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 11.81B |
| Float | — | 6.54B |
| Employees | — | 137,471 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 5.86 |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.48 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.90 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.17 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.37 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.03 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 2.06% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 5.56% |
| Return on Equity | — | 4.50% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.16% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.28 |
Growth
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -9.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -94.50% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.57% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.20 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.35 | -1.74 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.27 | -1.36 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.31 | -3.68 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5317 | 0.5465 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #17,979 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1944 | 601800 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 8005.10% |
| % Institutions | — | 619.70% |
Compare 1944 to peers
Compare 601800 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.