1944 vs 600039: KINDEN CORPORATION vs Sichuan Road & Bridge Group Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1944•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥7,056.00
-0.80%
60
600039•SHG
CN¥9.67
+0.62%
Quick Summary
KINDEN CORPORATION is 17.6× the market cap of Sichuan Road & Bridge Group Co Ltd. 600039 pays a dividend; 1944 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥7,056.00 | CN¥9.67 |
| Daily Change | -0.80% | 0.62% |
| 1-Year Return | 105.22% | 12.44% |
| 52-Week High | ¥8,488.00 | CN¥10.58 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥3,381.93 | CN¥8.03 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥9.76 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥9.27 |
| Beta | — | 0.30 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.48T | $84.09B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $138.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $108.64B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 8.70B |
| Float | — | 1.94B |
| Employees | — | 18,474 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 10.87 |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.74 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.35 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.77 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 11.41 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 7.12% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 11.42% |
| Return on Equity | — | 14.85% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.70% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.89 |
Growth
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 14.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 61.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.65% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.45 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.35 | 0.44 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.27 | 6.54 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.31 | 0.33 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5317 | 0.6122 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,668 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1944 | 600039 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7768.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 1152.90% |
Compare 1944 to peers
Compare 600039 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.