1942 vs FGR: KANDENKO CO.,LTD. vs Eiffage SA
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1942•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,141.00
-0.76%
FG
FGR•Euronext Paris
€142.70
+1.71%
Quick Summary
KANDENKO CO.,LTD. is 82.1× the market cap of Eiffage SA. FGR pays a dividend; 1942 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥6,141.00 | €142.70 |
| Daily Change | -0.76% | 1.71% |
| 1-Year Return | 121.24% | 25.67% |
| 52-Week High | ¥6,986.00 | €146.35 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,704.51 | €104.40 |
| 50-Day MA | — | €135.97 |
| 200-Day MA | — | €120.86 |
| Beta | — | 0.76 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.12T | $13.62B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $23.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $26.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 96.25M |
| Float | — | 72.92M |
| Employees | — | 87,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 13.22 |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.33 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.13 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.52 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 5.46 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 3.91% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 11.59% |
| Return on Equity | — | 17.30% |
| Return on Assets | — | 3.98% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 10.70 |
Growth
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 9.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 7.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.36% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 4.80 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.43 | 5.84 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.99 | 2.71 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.31 | 11.26 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5218 | 0.6469 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #8,852 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1942 | FGR |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 2015.50% |
| % Institutions | — | 4247.00% |
Compare 1942 to peers
Compare FGR to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.