1942 vs 601186: KANDENKO CO.,LTD. vs China Railway Construction Corp Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1942•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,141.00
-0.76%
60
601186•SHG
CN¥6.93
-0.43%
Quick Summary
KANDENKO CO.,LTD. is 11.9× the market cap of China Railway Construction Corp Ltd. 601186 pays a dividend; 1942 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥6,141.00 | CN¥6.93 |
| Daily Change | -0.76% | -0.43% |
| 1-Year Return | 121.24% | -14.13% |
| 52-Week High | ¥6,986.00 | CN¥8.81 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,704.51 | CN¥6.91 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥7.16 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥7.73 |
| Beta | — | 0.33 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.12T | $94.11B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $534.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.03T |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 11.50B |
| Float | — | 6.62B |
| Employees | — | 250,306 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 5.87 |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.09 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.76 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.09 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 7.92 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 1.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 2.70% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.11% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.19% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.18 |
Growth
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -2.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -71.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.31% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.30 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.43 | -1.58 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.99 | -1.28 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.31 | -2.64 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5218 | 0.5846 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 3/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #14,586 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1942 | 601186 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6167.70% |
| % Institutions | — | 1048.80% |
Compare 1942 to peers
Compare 601186 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.