1925 vs SUHJF: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
SUHJF•United States
$18.36
+0.00%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 55.8× the market cap of Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited. SUHJF pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | $18.36 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 110.31% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | $19.16 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | $9.42 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $16.77 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $13.06 |
| Beta | — | 0.83 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $58.52B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $61.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $92.49B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 2.90B |
| Float | — | 1.35B |
| Employees | — | 38,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 19.75 |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.50 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.06 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.63 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.70 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 15.63 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 23.79% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 24.34% |
| Return on Equity | — | 3.66% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.08% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.97 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 32.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 36.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 19.73% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 3.78 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 5.96 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 1.88 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 15.34 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5798 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #12,860 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5495.80% |
| % Institutions | — | 1471.20% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare SUHJF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.