1925 vs LODHA: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Macrotech Developers Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
LO
LODHA•NSE
₹872.55
-0.11%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 3.7× the market cap of Macrotech Developers Limited. LODHA pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | ₹872.55 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | -0.11% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | — |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | ₹1,300.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | ₹677.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | ₹890.81 |
| 200-Day MA | — | ₹1,094.11 |
| Beta | — | 0.38 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $871.40B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $885.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $163.45B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 998.92M |
| Float | — | 448.25M |
| Employees | — | 5,359 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 26.07 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 5.33 |
| Price / Book | — | 4.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.96 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 20.45% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 28.20% |
| Return on Equity | — | 16.90% |
| Return on Assets | — | 5.71% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 33.46 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 14.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 1.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.49% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 4.25 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | -0.18 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 5.64 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 2.09 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.8133 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,620 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | LODHA |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7183.80% |
| % Institutions | — | 1683.90% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare LODHA to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.