1925 vs DLR: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Digital Realty Trust Inc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%

DLR•United States
$203.62
+2.30%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 49.4× the market cap of Digital Realty Trust Inc. DLR pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | $203.62 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 2.30% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 35.07% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | $203.62 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | $146.34 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $177.10 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $169.28 |
| Beta | — | 1.09 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $66.07B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $87.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $5.48B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 343.62M |
| Float | — | 321.23M |
| Employees | — | 4,282 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 52.61 |
| Forward P/E | — | 111.11 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 17.63 |
| Price / Sales | — | 10.87 |
| Price / Book | — | 2.92 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 22.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 21.52% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 14.15% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.47% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.18% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 3.05 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 17.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -53.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.59% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 4.88 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 5.56 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 8.35 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 9.98 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.6623 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #27,459 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | DLR |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 2.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 10285.90% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare DLR to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.