1925 vs CTPVF: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs CTP N.V
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
CT
CTPVF•United States
$16.33
+0.00%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 314.3× the market cap of CTP N.V. CTPVF pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | $16.33 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 8.91% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | $22.71 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | $14.99 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $22.44 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $20.55 |
| Beta | — | 0.84 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $10.39B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $17.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $972.50M |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 479.28M |
| Float | — | 130.34M |
| Employees | — | 924 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 7.37 |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.46 |
| Price / Sales | — | 10.68 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.69 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 111.24% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 63.98% |
| Return on Equity | — | 13.68% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.23% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 2.94 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 5.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -38.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.91% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.63 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | -0.56 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | -0.64 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | -1.40 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5379 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #21,621 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | CTPVF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7223.80% |
| % Institutions | — | 1711.10% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare CTPVF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.