1925 vs CHKGF: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs CK Asset Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
CH
CHKGF•United States
$6.12
+0.00%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 152.5× the market cap of CK Asset Holdings Limited. CHKGF pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | $6.12 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 60.21% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | $6.34 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | $3.68 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $5.57 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $4.76 |
| Beta | — | 0.51 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $21.40B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $23.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $48.91B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 3.50B |
| Float | — | 1.89B |
| Employees | — | 55,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 14.50 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.38 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.39 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.44 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 10.13 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 23.80% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 21.48% |
| Return on Equity | — | 2.90% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.21% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.42 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 15.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -26.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 28.57% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 1.74 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 4.14 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 4.31 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 9.83 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.3401 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #14,033 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | CHKGF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 4890.20% |
| % Institutions | — | 1947.70% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare CHKGF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.