1925 vs CAOVY: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs China Overseas Land Investment
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
CA
CAOVY•United States
$8.10
-1.59%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 178.1× the market cap of China Overseas Land Investment. CAOVY pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | $8.10 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | -1.59% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | -12.52% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | $9.62 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | $7.07 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $8.84 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $8.77 |
| Beta | — | 0.31 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $18.33B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $35.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $181.44B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 2.19B |
| Float | — | 3.70B |
| Employees | — | 3,232 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 8.97 |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.84 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.40 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.10 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 10.08 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 7.67% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 13.26% |
| Return on Equity | — | 3.86% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.45% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.93 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -4.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -16.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.22% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.51 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 6.41 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 1.16 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 0.61 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5498 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,984 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | CAOVY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 0.00% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare CAOVY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.