1925 vs 600663: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Shanghai Lujiazui Finance & Trade Zone Development Co Ltd A
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
CN¥7.95
+0.89%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 81.6× the market cap of Shanghai Lujiazui Finance & Trade Zone Development Co Ltd A.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | CN¥7.95 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 0.89% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | -11.96% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | CN¥9.78 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | CN¥7.52 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥8.02 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥8.40 |
| Beta | — | 0.60 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $40.03B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $88.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $18.17B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 3.93B |
| Float | — | 1.62B |
| Employees | — | 6,250 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 26.50 |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.50 |
| Price / Sales | — | 2.20 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 44.83 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 6.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | -11.86% |
| Return on Equity | — | 2.48% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.63% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.30 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -20.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -64.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 3.73 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 0.97 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 0.86 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5186 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #23,239 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 600663 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 8451.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 486.70% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 600663 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.