1925 vs 600639: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Shanghai Jinqiao Export Processing Zone Development Co Ltd A
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
CN¥11.16
-0.53%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 260.6× the market cap of Shanghai Jinqiao Export Processing Zone Development Co Ltd A.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | CN¥11.16 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | -0.53% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 2.10% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | CN¥11.65 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | CN¥10.13 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥10.77 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥10.74 |
| Beta | — | 0.43 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $12.53B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $26.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $5.96B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 850.24M |
| Float | — | 568.32M |
| Employees | — | 242 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 13.13 |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.62 |
| Price / Sales | — | 2.10 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 15.30 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 18.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 16.66% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.72% |
| Return on Assets | — | 0.95% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.85 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 558.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 21.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 1.64 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 0.72 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 1.17 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5335 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 2/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #19,152 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 600639 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6785.10% |
| % Institutions | — | 384.70% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 600639 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.