1925 vs 3900: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Greentown China Holdings Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
39
3900•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$9.15
+0.33%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 139.3× the market cap of Greentown China Holdings Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | HK$9.15 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 0.33% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | -13.84% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | HK$11.55 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | HK$8.25 |
| 50-Day MA | — | HK$10.05 |
| 200-Day MA | — | HK$9.56 |
| Beta | — | 0.77 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $23.44B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $109.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $154.97B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 2.54B |
| Float | — | 1.02B |
| Employees | — | 8,734 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 307.67 |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.08 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.41 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.15 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 13.35 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 0.05% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 4.73% |
| Return on Equity | — | 2.09% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.22% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.08 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 14.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -90.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | -0.10 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 3.17 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | -0.27 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.6552 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #17,473 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5995.70% |
| % Institutions | — | 1018.40% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 3900 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.