1925 vs 2923: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Sino Horizon Holdings Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
29
2923•TW
NT$28.00
+3.51%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 69.3× the market cap of Sino Horizon Holdings Ltd. 2923 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | NT$28.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 3.51% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 37.93% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | NT$28.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | NT$17.20 |
| 50-Day MA | — | NT$20.93 |
| 200-Day MA | — | NT$21.40 |
| Beta | — | 1.03 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $47.08B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $79.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $5.80B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.74B |
| Float | — | 44.71M |
| Employees | — | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 8.12 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.97 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 36.51 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | -108.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 50.76% |
| Return on Equity | — | -12.24% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.20% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | -3.62 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 261.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 452.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.49% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.12 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 1.15 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 0.72 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 1.03 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5461 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 2/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #23,688 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 2923 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 9741.20% |
| % Institutions | — | 118.00% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 2923 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.