1925 vs 2548: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Huaku Development Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
25
2548•TW
NT$130.00
+1.17%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 79.5× the market cap of Huaku Development Co Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | NT$130.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 1.17% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 27.45% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | NT$130.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | NT$94.40 |
| 50-Day MA | — | NT$115.42 |
| 200-Day MA | — | NT$106.60 |
| Beta | — | -0.02 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $41.06B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $54.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $18.24B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 319.52M |
| Float | — | 257.41M |
| Employees | — | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 14.62 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| PEG Ratio | — | -0.43 |
| Price / Sales | — | 2.25 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 12.55 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 17.77% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 24.04% |
| Return on Equity | — | 14.98% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.49% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 8.79 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 29049.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -73.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 7.72 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 3.06 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 10.14 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.6225 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #10,052 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 2548 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 1779.90% |
| % Institutions | — | 1557.20% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 2548 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.