1925 vs 2542: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Highwealth Construction Corp
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
25
2542•TW
NT$34.95
-0.99%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 43.4× the market cap of Highwealth Construction Corp.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | NT$34.95 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | -0.99% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | -12.62% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | NT$46.75 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | NT$34.80 |
| 50-Day MA | — | NT$36.97 |
| 200-Day MA | — | NT$38.82 |
| Beta | — | 0.10 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $75.26B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $210.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $31.06B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 2.13B |
| Float | — | 1.37B |
| Employees | — | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 16.81 |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.59 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.92 |
| Price / Sales | — | 2.42 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 27.43 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 14.29% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 27.38% |
| Return on Equity | — | 8.67% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.54% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 2.10 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 36.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -24.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | -1.00 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | -0.87 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | -2.49 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5463 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 1/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #18,958 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 2542 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3542.70% |
| % Institutions | — | 825.80% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 2542 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.