1925 vs 2539: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Sakura Development Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
25
2539•TW
NT$46.70
-0.53%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 58.3× the market cap of Sakura Development Co Ltd. 2539 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | NT$46.70 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | -0.53% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | -26.46% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | NT$69.20 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | NT$43.60 |
| 50-Day MA | — | NT$48.33 |
| 200-Day MA | — | NT$49.49 |
| Beta | — | 0.16 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $56.02B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $56.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $14.00B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.19B |
| Float | — | 357.42M |
| Employees | — | 111 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 13.57 |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.87 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 4.00 |
| Price / Book | — | 3.15 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 11.07 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 29.45% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 39.40% |
| Return on Equity | — | 25.62% |
| Return on Assets | — | 9.87% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 3.46 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -43.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -46.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.27% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.60 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | -1.59 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | -1.61 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | -3.97 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5889 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #5,676 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 2539 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7342.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 175.60% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 2539 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.