1925 vs 2501: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
NT$24.45
-1.21%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 114.9× the market cap of Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | NT$24.45 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | -1.21% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 30.40% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | NT$24.95 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | NT$18.25 |
| 50-Day MA | — | NT$22.98 |
| 200-Day MA | — | NT$22.21 |
| Beta | — | 0.16 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $28.41B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $56.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $24.29B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.16B |
| Float | — | 930.66M |
| Employees | — | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 8.66 |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.83 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.73 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.17 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.93 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 10.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 13.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 17.13% |
| Return on Equity | — | 10.42% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.87% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 2.83 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -6.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 76.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 2.24 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 1.27 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 7.24 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.6384 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #12,830 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 2501 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5421.60% |
| % Institutions | — | 1173.40% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 2501 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.