1919 vs 3816: COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H vs MISC
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1919•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$14.70
-1.54%
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
Quick Summary
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H is 7.3× the market cap of MISC. 1919 pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$14.70 | MYR 8.17 |
| Daily Change | -1.54% | 0.49% |
| 1-Year Return | 30.55% | 19.12% |
| 52-Week High | HK$16.29 | MYR 8.59 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$11.16 | MYR 6.74 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$15.01 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$14.02 | — |
| Beta | 0.74 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $259.60B | $35.71B |
| Enterprise Value | $174.78B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $219.50B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.75B | — |
| Float | 7.15B | — |
| Employees | 32,768 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 6.70 | — |
| Forward P/E | 6.74 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 3.66 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.18 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.88 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.39 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 14.06% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.82% | — |
| Return on Equity | 12.39% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.32% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.71 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -12.20% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -64.60% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.52% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.31 | 1.15 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.46 | 0.60 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.18 | 0.93 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6722 | 0.5279 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,241 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1919 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1378.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 2915.00% | — |
Compare 1919 to peers
Compare 3816 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.