1909 vs NXSNF: Nippon Dry-Chemical CO.,LTD. vs NextVision Stabilized Systems, Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1909•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,649.00
+0.88%
NX
NXSNF•United States
$94.00
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Nippon Dry-Chemical CO.,LTD. is 6.5× the market cap of NextVision Stabilized Systems, Ltd.. NXSNF pays a dividend; 1909 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥2,649.00 | $94.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.88% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -35.10% | 283.67% |
| 52-Week High | ¥13,050.00 | $123.19 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,450.00 | $24.50 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $93.80 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $57.18 |
| Beta | — | 0.99 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $73.61B | $11.25B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $10.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $168.35M |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 91.31M |
| Float | — | 71.23M |
| Employees | — | 88 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 112.06 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 66.82 |
| Price / Book | — | 18.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 98.22 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 61.58% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 58.61% |
| Return on Equity | — | 27.52% |
| Return on Assets | — | 15.75% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.07 |
Growth
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 56.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 19.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.47% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.57 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.68 | 8.52 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.65 | 3.69 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.85 | 11.62 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5481 | 0.5585 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 9/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,920 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1909 | NXSNF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 1972.80% |
| % Institutions | — | 4041.60% |
Compare 1909 to peers
Compare NXSNF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.