1908 vs 1925: C&D International Investment Group Ltd vs DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
19
1908•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$14.17
-0.21%
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 109.5× the market cap of C&D International Investment Group Ltd. 1908 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$14.17 | ¥4,852.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.21% | -1.36% |
| 1-Year Return | -15.86% | -4.80% |
| 52-Week High | HK$18.90 | ¥5,710.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$12.61 | ¥4,763.31 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$14.33 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$16.14 | — |
| Beta | 0.26 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $29.82B | $3.26T |
| Enterprise Value | $60.14B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136.79B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.10B | — |
| Float | 745.95M | — |
| Employees | 23,153 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 8.02 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.22 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.61 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.14 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.67% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.73% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.58% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.59% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.20 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.90% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -39.30% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.79% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.81 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.47 | -1.59 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.46 | -1.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 7.96 | -4.41 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5670 | 0.5586 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #14,682 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1908 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6065.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 2150.30% | — |
Compare 1908 to peers
Compare 1925 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.