1893 vs GBF: PENTA-OCEAN CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. vs Bilfinger SE
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1893•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,682.50
-1.46%
GB
GBF•XETRA (Frankfurt)
€111.10
+3.25%
Quick Summary
PENTA-OCEAN CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. is 111.2× the market cap of Bilfinger SE. GBF pays a dividend; 1893 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,682.50 | €111.10 |
| Daily Change | -1.46% | 3.25% |
| 1-Year Return | 115.79% | 59.86% |
| 52-Week High | ¥2,222.50 | €127.90 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥773.57 | €69.80 |
| 50-Day MA | — | €109.59 |
| 200-Day MA | — | €102.58 |
| Beta | — | 0.58 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $456.32B | $4.10B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $3.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $5.43B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 36.94M |
| Float | — | 31.31M |
| Employees | — | 29,601 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 23.64 |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.44 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 3.62 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.76 |
| Price / Book | — | 3.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.80 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 3.24% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 5.15% |
| Return on Equity | — | 13.81% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.93% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 4.70 |
Growth
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 4.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -16.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.60% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 2.80 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.96 | 3.07 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.43 | 8.95 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6782 | 0.5527 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #10,043 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1893 | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 6925.40% |
Compare 1893 to peers
Compare GBF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.