1882 vs 6383: Haitian International Holdings Ltd vs DAIFUKU CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1882•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$21.62
-0.55%
6383•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,370.00
-1.65%
Quick Summary
DAIFUKU CO.,LTD. is 57.3× the market cap of Haitian International Holdings Ltd. 1882 pays a dividend; 6383 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$21.62 | ¥6,370.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.55% | -1.65% |
| 1-Year Return | 25.99% | 83.53% |
| 52-Week High | HK$25.70 | ¥6,578.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$17.76 | ¥3,414.78 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$22.93 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$22.31 | — |
| Beta | 1.12 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $34.63B | $1.99T |
| Enterprise Value | $21.36B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.73B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.60B | — |
| Float | 627.32M | — |
| Employees | 8,768 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.12 | — |
| Forward P/E | 11.34 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 2.15 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.95 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.29 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.58 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 18.62% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.56% | — |
| Return on Equity | 15.03% | — |
| Return on Assets | 6.73% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.05 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 1.90% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.36% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.72 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.82 | 5.49 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.16 | 2.89 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.07 | 11.87 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5706 | 0.5674 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #6,913 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1882 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6401.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 1819.10% | — |
Compare 1882 to peers
Compare 6383 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.