1812 vs RVNL: KAJIMA CORPORATION vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
18
1812•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥5,932.00
-3.94%
RVNL•NSE
₹303.06
+3.12%
Quick Summary
KAJIMA CORPORATION is 4.7× the market cap of Rail Vikas Nigam Limited.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥5,932.00 | ₹303.06 |
| Daily Change | -3.94% | 3.12% |
| 1-Year Return | 84.06% | — |
| 52-Week High | ¥7,696.00 | ₹387.95 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥3,229.82 | ₹249.65 |
| 50-Day MA | — | ₹285.29 |
| 200-Day MA | — | ₹323.33 |
| Beta | — | 1.00 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.01T | $638.30B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $591.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $201.43B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 2.09B |
| Float | — | 565.66M |
| Employees | — | 329 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 54.26 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 3.17 |
| Price / Book | — | 6.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 30.44 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 5.69% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 4.52% |
| Return on Equity | — | 12.38% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.91% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 5.64 |
Growth
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 2.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 4.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.94 | 4.64 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.08 | 2.19 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.06 | 17.96 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6395 | 0.5803 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #18,823 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1812 | RVNL |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7284.10% |
| % Institutions | — | 943.60% |
Compare 1812 to peers
Compare RVNL to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.