1812 vs 601390: KAJIMA CORPORATION vs China Railway Group Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
18
1812•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥5,932.00
-3.94%
601390•SHG
CN¥5.32
+0.38%
Quick Summary
KAJIMA CORPORATION is 22.9× the market cap of China Railway Group Limited. 601390 pays a dividend; 1812 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥5,932.00 | CN¥5.32 |
| Daily Change | -3.94% | 0.38% |
| 1-Year Return | 84.06% | -6.99% |
| 52-Week High | ¥7,696.00 | CN¥6.30 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥3,229.82 | CN¥5.20 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥5.60 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥5.61 |
| Beta | — | 0.55 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.01T | $131.33B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $435.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.09T |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 20.48B |
| Float | — | 12.15B |
| Employees | — | 289,250 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 6.26 |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.80 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.48 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.12 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 6.54 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 2.09% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 4.09% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.02% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.14% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.85 |
Growth
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -6.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -35.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.17% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.17 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.94 | -0.66 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.08 | 1.84 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.06 | -1.28 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6395 | 0.5002 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 3/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #14,067 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1812 | 601390 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6071.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 1192.40% |
Compare 1812 to peers
Compare 601390 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.