1803 vs LT: SHIMIZU CORPORATION vs Larsen & Toubro Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1803•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,758.00
-4.86%
LT•NSE
₹4,096.10
-0.58%
Quick Summary
Larsen & Toubro Limited is 3.0× the market cap of SHIMIZU CORPORATION.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥2,758.00 | ₹4,096.10 |
| Daily Change | -4.86% | -0.58% |
| 1-Year Return | 96.96% | — |
| 52-Week High | ¥3,578.00 | ₹4,418.10 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,394.34 | ₹3,434.50 |
| 50-Day MA | — | ₹3,901.61 |
| 200-Day MA | — | ₹3,835.64 |
| Beta | — | 0.42 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.85T | $5.63T |
| Enterprise Value | — | $6.31T |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $2.83T |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.38B |
| Float | — | 1.14B |
| Employees | — | 54,596 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 32.07 |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.73 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.06 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.99 |
| Price / Book | — | 5.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 18.29 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 5.75% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 10.68% |
| Return on Equity | — | 16.52% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.71% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 127.71 |
Growth
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 11.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -4.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.30 | 10.71 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.40 | 5.66 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.34 | 0.80 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.7233 | 0.7805 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #12,855 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1803 | LT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 1718.60% |
| % Institutions | — | 4915.80% |
Compare 1803 to peers
Compare LT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.