1802 vs HOT: OBAYASHI CORPORATION vs HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
HOT•XETRA (Frankfurt)
€465.00
+2.51%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 72.3× the market cap of HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft. HOT pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,685.00 | €465.00 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | 2.51% |
| 1-Year Return | 76.54% | 190.63% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,416.00 | €468.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,071.64 | €152.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | €392.54 |
| 200-Day MA | — | €296.95 |
| Beta | — | 0.72 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.46T | $34.02B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $35.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $38.24B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 75.24M |
| Float | — | 18.28M |
| Employees | — | 44,607 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 37.75 |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.48 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.80 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.89 |
| Price / Book | — | 26.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 13.86 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 2.36% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 1.17% |
| Return on Equity | — | 78.87% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.73% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 11.98 |
Growth
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 4.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 25.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.46% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 6.60 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | 9.50 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.61 | 4.94 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.72 | 14.39 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5744 | 0.5474 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #17,800 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1802 | HOT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7753.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 672.30% |
Compare 1802 to peers
Compare HOT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.