1802 vs 601669: OBAYASHI CORPORATION vs Power Construction Corp of China Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
60
601669•SHG
CN¥5.71
-0.17%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 25.0× the market cap of Power Construction Corp of China Ltd. 601669 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,685.00 | CN¥5.71 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | -0.17% |
| 1-Year Return | 76.54% | 19.71% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,416.00 | CN¥7.45 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,071.64 | CN¥4.69 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥5.78 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥5.73 |
| Beta | — | 0.20 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.46T | $98.36B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $546.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $646.71B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 17.23B |
| Float | — | 8.09B |
| Employees | — | 163,912 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 10.20 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.15 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.57 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 1.66% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 3.62% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.16% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.37% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.56 |
Growth
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 3.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -17.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.22% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.13 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | 1.15 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.61 | 0.35 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.72 | -0.21 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5744 | 0.6837 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #22,387 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1802 | 601669 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5368.70% |
| % Institutions | — | 1069.90% |
Compare 1802 to peers
Compare 601669 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.