1802 vs 601668: OBAYASHI CORPORATION vs China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
CN¥4.94
-0.80%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 12.0× the market cap of China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd. 601668 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,685.00 | CN¥4.94 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | -0.80% |
| 1-Year Return | 76.54% | -10.18% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,416.00 | CN¥6.13 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,071.64 | CN¥4.88 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥5.02 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥5.34 |
| Beta | — | 0.34 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.46T | $204.12B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $754.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $2.12T |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 41.32B |
| Float | — | 17.48B |
| Employees | — | 361,249 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 4.62 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.10 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 7.72 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 2.11% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 3.89% |
| Return on Equity | — | 7.50% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.77% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.07 |
Growth
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -6.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -21.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 5.46% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.27 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | -0.70 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.61 | -0.61 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.72 | -1.55 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5744 | 0.5277 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 3/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,312 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1802 | 601668 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5912.50% |
| % Institutions | — | 1107.90% |
Compare 1802 to peers
Compare 601668 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.