1802 vs 600072: OBAYASHI CORPORATION vs CSSC Steel Structure Engineering Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
60
600072•SHG
CN¥12.00
-0.41%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 136.9× the market cap of CSSC Steel Structure Engineering Co Ltd. 600072 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,685.00 | CN¥12.00 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | -0.41% |
| 1-Year Return | 76.54% | 0.08% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,416.00 | CN¥13.51 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,071.64 | CN¥11.41 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥12.85 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥12.44 |
| Beta | — | 0.67 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.46T | $17.96B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $32.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $9.76B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.50B |
| Float | — | 883.94M |
| Employees | — | 3,696 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | — | 256.41 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.84 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 35.72 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | -12.47% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | -26.44% |
| Return on Equity | — | -10.59% |
| Return on Assets | — | -2.52% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | -0.81 |
Growth
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 20.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -6.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.25% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.03 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | -0.61 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.61 | -0.77 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.72 | -2.43 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5744 | 0.5372 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #26,813 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1802 | 600072 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 4971.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 653.90% |
Compare 1802 to peers
Compare 600072 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.