1802 vs 3996: OBAYASHI CORPORATION vs China Energy Engineering Corp
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
39
3996•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.28
+1.59%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 24.1× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp. 3996 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,685.00 | HK$1.28 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | 1.59% |
| 1-Year Return | 76.54% | 29.29% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,416.00 | HK$1.60 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,071.64 | HK$0.98 |
| 50-Day MA | — | HK$1.28 |
| 200-Day MA | — | HK$1.22 |
| Beta | — | 0.54 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.46T | $102.13B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $360.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $452.93B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 9.26B |
| Float | — | 19.53B |
| Employees | — | 116,055 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 5.73 |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.19 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.23 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 13.30 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 1.29% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 5.42% |
| Return on Equity | — | 4.70% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.37% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.15 |
Growth
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -8.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -47.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.42% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.03 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | 0.75 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.61 | 0.42 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.72 | -0.19 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5744 | 0.6543 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #19,687 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1802 | 3996 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3399.50% |
| % Institutions | — | 2316.90% |
Compare 1802 to peers
Compare 3996 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.