1802 vs 2386: OBAYASHI CORPORATION vs Sinopec Engineering(Group)Co
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
23
2386•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$6.30
-0.47%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 88.2× the market cap of Sinopec Engineering(Group)Co. 2386 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,685.00 | HK$6.30 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | -0.47% |
| 1-Year Return | 76.54% | 18.20% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,416.00 | HK$7.99 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,071.64 | HK$5.41 |
| 50-Day MA | — | HK$7.04 |
| 200-Day MA | — | HK$7.03 |
| Beta | — | 0.68 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.46T | $27.86B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $-3.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $70.07B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.65B |
| Float | — | 1.42B |
| Employees | — | 16,049 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 13.49 |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.08 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.40 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 1.41 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 2.57% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 0.03% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.70% |
| Return on Assets | — | 0.81% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.32 |
Growth
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 8.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -64.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.09% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.26 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | -0.07 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.61 | -0.07 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.72 | -0.77 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5744 | 0.6478 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,639 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1802 | 2386 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 1335.80% |
| % Institutions | — | 3245.10% |
Compare 1802 to peers
Compare 2386 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.