1800 vs SQU: China Communications Const-H vs Vinci S. A.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
18
1800•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$4.60
-0.22%
SQ
SQU•XETRA (Frankfurt)
€137.55
+2.27%
Quick Summary
China Communications Const-H is 1.6× the market cap of Vinci S. A.. 1800 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. 1800 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$4.60 | €137.55 |
| Daily Change | -0.22% | 2.27% |
| 1-Year Return | -5.54% | 14.86% |
| 52-Week High | HK$5.97 | €142.20 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$4.49 | €113.20 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$4.92 | €133.07 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$5.17 | €123.28 |
| Beta | 0.52 | 0.79 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $119.77B | $76.21B |
| Enterprise Value | $788.28B | $95.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $731.11B | $75.70B |
| Shares Outstanding | 11.83B | 553.21M |
| Float | 7.09B | 477.50M |
| Employees | 137,471 | 292,101 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 3.07 | 15.90 |
| Forward P/E | 3.33 | 14.99 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.05 | 2.78 |
| Price / Sales | 0.16 | 1.01 |
| Price / Book | 0.20 | 2.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.02 | 6.97 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 2.02% | 6.48% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.88% | 13.14% |
| Return on Equity | 4.45% | 15.43% |
| Return on Assets | 1.19% | 4.32% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.81 | 8.65 |
Growth
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -7.70% | 5.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -85.60% | 6.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.30% | 3.72% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.20 | 5.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.04 | 6.26 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.59 | 2.57 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.70 | 2.43 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5037 | 0.5565 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 1/9 | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #22,955 | #9,038 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1800 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 712.40% | 1210.50% |
| % Institutions | 376.10% | 5061.00% |
Compare 1800 to peers
Compare SQU to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.