Sign up for free insights newsletter

1800 vs LT: China Communications Const-H vs Larsen & Toubro Limited

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

18
1800Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$4.60
-0.22%
Hong Kong
$119.77B
₹4,096.10
-0.58%
India
$5.63T

Quick Summary

Larsen & Toubro Limited is 47.0× the market cap of China Communications Const-H. 1800 trades at a lower P/E than LT. 1800 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric1800LT
Current PriceHK$4.60₹4,096.10
Daily Change-0.22%-0.58%
1-Year Return-5.54%
52-Week HighHK$5.97₹4,418.10
52-Week LowHK$4.49₹3,434.50
50-Day MAHK$4.92₹3,901.61
200-Day MAHK$5.17₹3,835.64
Beta0.520.42

Size & Revenue

Metric1800LT
Market Cap$119.77B$5.63T
Enterprise Value$788.28B$6.31T
Revenue (TTM)$731.11B$2.83T
Shares Outstanding11.83B1.38B
Float7.09B1.14B
Employees137,47154,596

Valuation

Metric1800LT
Trailing P/E3.0732.07
Forward P/E3.3322.73
PEG Ratio1.051.06
Price / Sales0.161.99
Price / Book0.205.59
EV / EBITDA8.0218.29

Profitability

Metric1800LT
Profit Margin2.02%5.75%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.88%10.68%
Return on Equity4.45%16.52%
Return on Assets1.19%4.71%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.81127.71

Growth

Metric1800LT
Revenue Growth (YoY)-7.70%11.10%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-85.60%-4.30%

Dividends

Metric1800LT
Dividend Yield4.30%0.00%
Dividend / Share0.200.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric1800LT
Sortino (Composite)-0.0410.71
Sharpe (Composite)-0.595.66
Calmar (Composite)-1.700.80
Hurst Exponent0.50370.7805
Piotroski F-Score1/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#22,955#12,855

Ownership

Metric1800LT
% Insiders712.40%1718.60%
% Institutions376.10%4915.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.