Home 1800 vs 601668 1800 vs 601668: China Communications Const-H vs China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
18
1800 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd is 1.7× the market cap of China Communications Const-H. 1800 trades at a lower P/E than 601668. 601668 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1800 601668 Current Price HK$4.60 CN¥4.94 Daily Change -0.22% -0.80% 1-Year Return -5.54% -10.18% 52-Week High HK$5.97 CN¥6.13 52-Week Low HK$4.49 CN¥4.88 50-Day MA HK$4.92 CN¥5.02 200-Day MA HK$5.17 CN¥5.34 Beta 0.52 0.34
Size & Revenue Metric 1800 601668 Market Cap $119.77B $204.12B Enterprise Value $788.28B $754.31B Revenue (TTM) $731.11B $2.12T Shares Outstanding 11.83B 41.32B Float 7.09B 17.48B Employees 137,471 361,249
Valuation Metric 1800 601668 Trailing P/E 3.07 4.62 Forward P/E 3.33 0.00 PEG Ratio 1.05 — Price / Sales 0.16 0.10 Price / Book 0.20 0.42 EV / EBITDA 8.02 7.72
Profitability Metric 1800 601668 Profit Margin 2.02% 2.11% Operating Margin (TTM) 5.88% 3.89% Return on Equity 4.45% 7.50% Return on Assets 1.19% 1.77% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.81 1.07
Growth Metric 1800 601668 Revenue Growth (YoY) -7.70% -6.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -85.60% -21.00%
Dividends Metric 1800 601668 Dividend Yield 4.30% 5.46% Dividend / Share 0.20 0.27
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1800 601668 Sortino (Composite) -0.04 -0.70 Sharpe (Composite) -0.59 -0.61 Calmar (Composite) -1.70 -1.55 Hurst Exponent 0.5037 0.5277 Piotroski F-Score 1/9 3/9 Magic Formula Rank #22,955 #13,312
Ownership Metric 1800 601668 % Insiders 712.40% 5912.50% % Institutions 376.10% 1107.90%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.