1766 vs 7102: CRRC Corp Ltd vs NIPPON SHARYO,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
17
1766•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$5.14
-0.19%
7102•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,625.00
-1.36%
Quick Summary
CRRC Corp Ltd is 3.5× the market cap of NIPPON SHARYO,LTD.. 1766 pays a dividend; 7102 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$5.14 | ¥3,625.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.19% | -1.36% |
| 1-Year Return | 9.36% | 83.41% |
| 52-Week High | HK$6.61 | ¥4,420.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$4.69 | ¥1,981.45 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$5.51 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$5.87 | — |
| Beta | 0.36 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $180.90B | $52.31B |
| Enterprise Value | $136.54B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $273.06B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.37B | — |
| Float | 13.93B | — |
| Employees | 151,602 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.60 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.35 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.54 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.66 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.74 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.07 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 4.83% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 3.91% | — |
| Return on Equity | 7.93% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.04% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.53 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -40.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.50% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.23 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.34 | 3.19 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.45 | 1.55 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.68 | 2.67 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4877 | 0.5862 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #13,121 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1766 | 7102 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 406.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 2722.30% | — |
Compare 1766 to peers
Compare 7102 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.