1519 vs 6503: Fortune Electric Co Ltd vs Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
15
1519•TW
NT$872.00
+0.00%
6503•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥5,799.00
-2.95%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation is 35.9× the market cap of Fortune Electric Co Ltd. 1519 pays a dividend; 6503 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | NT$872.00 | ¥5,799.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | -2.95% |
| 1-Year Return | 125.32% | 126.12% |
| 52-Week High | NT$1,080.00 | ¥5,994.00 |
| 52-Week Low | NT$373.00 | ¥2,492.06 |
| 50-Day MA | NT$919.24 | — |
| 200-Day MA | NT$744.41 | — |
| Beta | 1.11 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $275.45B | $9.90T |
| Enterprise Value | $274.56B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.42B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 315.88M | — |
| Float | 135.94M | — |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 62.55 | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.10 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 11.28 | — |
| Price / Book | 26.18 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.65 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 18.09% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.93% | — |
| Return on Equity | 44.58% | — |
| Return on Assets | 13.31% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 13.94 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 13.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 7.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 11.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.78 | 5.43 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 5.35 | 3.18 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.58 | 9.39 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6161 | 0.5346 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #12,780 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1519 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4878.50% | — |
| % Institutions | 1288.50% | — |
Compare 1519 to peers
Compare 6503 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.