1503 vs 6503: Shihlin Electric & Engineering Corp vs Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
NT$197.50
+0.77%
6503•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥5,799.00
-2.95%
Quick Summary
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation is 97.0× the market cap of Shihlin Electric & Engineering Corp. 1503 pays a dividend; 6503 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | NT$197.50 | ¥5,799.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.77% | -2.95% |
| 1-Year Return | 41.07% | 126.12% |
| 52-Week High | NT$237.00 | ¥5,994.00 |
| 52-Week Low | NT$134.50 | ¥2,492.06 |
| 50-Day MA | NT$204.26 | — |
| 200-Day MA | NT$187.79 | — |
| Beta | 1.07 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $102.11B | $9.90T |
| Enterprise Value | $97.52B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.18B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 520.97M | — |
| Float | 264.70M | — |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 31.26 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 2.75 | — |
| Price / Book | 2.78 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.11 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 8.79% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.03% | — |
| Return on Equity | 8.95% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.52% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 6.27 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.60% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -3.30% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.58% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 5.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.99 | 5.43 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.71 | 3.18 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.68 | 9.39 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6466 | 0.5346 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #14,387 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1503 | 6503 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4879.70% | — |
| % Institutions | 504.80% | — |
Compare 1503 to peers
Compare 6503 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.