1209 vs SWPFF: China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv vs Swire Properties Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
12
1209•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$48.08
-0.29%
SW
SWPFF•United States
$3.14
+0.00%
Quick Summary
China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv is 6.5× the market cap of Swire Properties Limited. SWPFF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$48.08 | $3.14 |
| Daily Change | -0.29% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 32.82% | 56.75% |
| 52-Week High | HK$49.24 | $3.35 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$36.00 | $2.08 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$46.82 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$42.69 | — |
| Beta | 0.73 | 0.69 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $111.84B | $17.28B |
| Enterprise Value | $98.35B | $62.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.02B | $16.60B |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.28B | 5.76B |
| Float | 599.41M | 960.69M |
| Employees | 37,704 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 24.50 | — |
| Forward P/E | 21.10 | — |
| Price / Sales | 6.21 | 1.04 |
| Price / Book | 6.03 | 0.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.69 | 6.92 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 22.02% | -9.24% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.45% | 57.69% |
| Return on Equity | 25.20% | -0.56% |
| Return on Assets | 10.48% | 1.52% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.64 | -0.03 |
Growth
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.50% | 4.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 12.60% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.22% | 489.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 1.04 | 0.15 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.97 | 0.78 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.81 | 0.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 6.67 | -1.89 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5572 | 0.5795 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 9/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #11,191 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1209 | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7157.10% | 83.31% |
| % Institutions | 1477.10% | 6.53% |
Compare 1209 to peers
Compare SWPFF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.