1113 vs 1925: CK Asset Holdings Ltd vs DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
11
1113•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$46.84
-3.42%
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 19.2× the market cap of CK Asset Holdings Ltd. 1113 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$46.84 | ¥4,852.00 |
| Daily Change | -3.42% | -1.36% |
| 1-Year Return | 54.08% | -4.80% |
| 52-Week High | HK$49.78 | ¥5,710.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$30.95 | ¥4,763.31 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$46.60 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$40.74 | — |
| Beta | 0.56 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $170.16B | $3.26T |
| Enterprise Value | $183.65B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $57.93B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.50B | — |
| Float | 1.89B | — |
| Employees | 54,000 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 15.68 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.25 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.74 | — |
| Price / Sales | 2.94 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.42 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.82 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 19.22% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 15.99% | — |
| Return on Equity | 2.75% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.32% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 3.20 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 38.40% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -7.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.68% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.78 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.87 | -1.59 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.85 | -1.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.47 | -4.41 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5835 | 0.5586 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #18,708 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1113 | 1925 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4890.20% | — |
| % Institutions | 1976.80% | — |
Compare 1113 to peers
Compare 1925 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.