Home 1109 vs CTPVF 1109 vs CTPVF: China Resources Land Ltd vs CTP N.V Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1109 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China Resources Land Ltd is 21.2× the market cap of CTP N.V. CTPVF trades at a lower P/E than 1109. 1109 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1109 CTPVF Current Price HK$31.34 $16.33 Daily Change 0.32% 0.00% 1-Year Return 14.59% 8.91% 52-Week High HK$33.10 $22.71 52-Week Low HK$24.95 $14.99 50-Day MA HK$30.36 $22.44 200-Day MA HK$29.81 $20.55 Beta 0.63 0.84
Size & Revenue Metric 1109 CTPVF Market Cap $220.35B $10.39B Enterprise Value $411.79B $17.87B Revenue (TTM) $281.44B $972.50M Shares Outstanding 7.13B 479.28M Float 2.88B 130.34M Employees 59,077 924
Valuation Metric 1109 CTPVF Trailing P/E 7.57 7.37 Forward P/E 6.07 19.46 PEG Ratio 0.66 — Price / Sales 0.78 10.68 Price / Book 0.66 1.09 EV / EBITDA 6.38 8.69
Profitability Metric 1109 CTPVF Profit Margin 9.03% 111.24% Operating Margin (TTM) 14.59% 63.98% Return on Equity 8.04% 13.68% Return on Assets 2.56% 2.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) 3.82 2.94
Growth Metric 1109 CTPVF Revenue Growth (YoY) -6.60% 5.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -11.70% -38.30%
Dividends Metric 1109 CTPVF Dividend Yield 3.77% 2.91% Dividend / Share 1.17 0.63
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1109 CTPVF Sortino (Composite) 2.14 -0.56 Sharpe (Composite) 4.96 -0.64 Calmar (Composite) 4.71 -1.40 Hurst Exponent 0.5430 0.5379 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #13,989 #21,621
Ownership Metric 1109 CTPVF % Insiders 5955.30% 7223.80% % Institutions 1745.90% 1711.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.