Home 1109 vs CTPNV 1109 vs CTPNV: China Resources Land Ltd vs CTP N.V. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1109 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China Resources Land Ltd is 28.3× the market cap of CTP N.V.. CTPNV trades at a lower P/E than 1109. CTPNV offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1109 CTPNV Current Price HK$31.34 €16.66 Daily Change 0.32% 2.21% 1-Year Return 14.59% 2.08% 52-Week High HK$33.10 €19.60 52-Week Low HK$24.95 €14.14 50-Day MA HK$30.36 €16.94 200-Day MA HK$29.81 €17.92 Beta 0.63 0.94
Size & Revenue Metric 1109 CTPNV Market Cap $220.35B $7.79B Enterprise Value $411.79B $16.37B Revenue (TTM) $281.44B $972.50M Shares Outstanding 7.13B 485.04M Float 2.88B 129.31M Employees 59,077 924
Valuation Metric 1109 CTPNV Trailing P/E 7.57 7.11 Forward P/E 6.07 16.13 PEG Ratio 0.66 2.76 Price / Sales 0.78 8.01 Price / Book 0.66 0.92 EV / EBITDA 6.38 9.83
Profitability Metric 1109 CTPNV Profit Margin 9.03% 111.24% Operating Margin (TTM) 14.59% 63.98% Return on Equity 8.04% 13.68% Return on Assets 2.56% 2.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) 3.82 2.26
Growth Metric 1109 CTPNV Revenue Growth (YoY) -6.60% 5.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -11.70% -38.30%
Dividends Metric 1109 CTPNV Dividend Yield 3.77% 3.99% Dividend / Share 1.17 0.63
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1109 CTPNV Sortino (Composite) 2.14 1.28 Sharpe (Composite) 4.96 3.64 Calmar (Composite) 4.71 3.86 Hurst Exponent 0.5430 0.5953 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank #13,989 #21,157
Ownership Metric 1109 CTPNV % Insiders 5955.30% 7330.30% % Institutions 1745.90% 1701.50%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.