Home 1109 vs CRBJF 1109 vs CRBJF: China Resources Land Ltd vs China Resources Land Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1109 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China Resources Land Ltd is 7.8× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than 1109. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1109 CRBJF Current Price HK$31.34 $3.80 Daily Change 0.32% 0.00% 1-Year Return 14.59% — 52-Week High HK$33.10 $3.98 52-Week Low HK$24.95 $3.80 50-Day MA HK$30.36 — 200-Day MA HK$29.81 — Beta 0.63 —
Size & Revenue Metric 1109 CRBJF Market Cap $220.35B $28.38B Enterprise Value $411.79B $374.32B Revenue (TTM) $281.44B $281.44B Shares Outstanding 7.13B 7.13B Float 2.88B 2.89B Employees 59,077 —
Valuation Metric 1109 CRBJF Trailing P/E 7.57 7.37 Forward P/E 6.07 — PEG Ratio 0.66 — Price / Sales 0.78 0.10 Price / Book 0.66 0.68 EV / EBITDA 6.38 8.09
Profitability Metric 1109 CRBJF Profit Margin 9.03% 9.03% Operating Margin (TTM) 14.59% 14.59% Return on Equity 8.04% 8.04% Return on Assets 2.56% 2.56% Diluted EPS (TTM) 3.82 0.54
Growth Metric 1109 CRBJF Revenue Growth (YoY) -6.60% -6.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -11.70% -11.70%
Dividends Metric 1109 CRBJF Dividend Yield 3.77% 462.00% Dividend / Share 1.17 0.18
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1109 CRBJF Sortino (Composite) 2.14 — Sharpe (Composite) 4.96 — Calmar (Composite) 4.71 — Hurst Exponent 0.5430 — Piotroski F-Score 8/9 — Magic Formula Rank #13,989 —
Ownership Metric 1109 CRBJF % Insiders 5955.30% 59.55% % Institutions 1745.90% 17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.