1055 vs 601111: China Southern Airlines Co Ltd vs Air China Ltd Class A
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

1055•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$4.16
-1.89%
60
601111•SHG
CN¥6.92
-1.00%
Quick Summary
China Southern Airlines Co Ltd and Air China Ltd Class A are similar in size. 601111 trades at a lower P/E than 1055.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1055 | 601111 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$4.16 | CN¥6.92 |
| Daily Change | -1.89% | -1.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 24.55% | -6.49% |
| 52-Week High | HK$6.50 | CN¥9.37 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$3.18 | CN¥6.65 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$5.08 | CN¥7.64 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$4.76 | CN¥8.01 |
| Beta | 0.51 | 0.45 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1055 | 601111 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $113.00B | $120.57B |
| Enterprise Value | $338.97B | $311.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $182.26B | $171.48B |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.64B | 12.49B |
| Float | 5.43B | 4.98B |
| Employees | 108,176 | 107,795 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1055 | 601111 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 70.33 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 8.47 | 39.37 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.73 | 7.11 |
| Price / Sales | 0.62 | 0.70 |
| Price / Book | 1.84 | 2.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.13 | 8.97 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1055 | 601111 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.47% | -1.03% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -1.02% | -8.09% |
| Return on Equity | 4.99% | -8.79% |
| Return on Assets | 1.61% | -0.10% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.08 | -0.11 |
Growth
| Metric | 1055 | 601111 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.70% | 8.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -4.80% | -30.00% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1055 | 601111 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.02 | -0.36 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.06 | -0.34 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.35 | 2.41 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5467 | 0.5531 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #22,067 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1055 | 601111 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5703.80% | 7282.50% |
| % Institutions | 1526.70% | 945.00% |
Compare 1055 to peers
Compare 601111 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.