1030 vs SNLAF: Seazen Group Ltd vs Sino Land Company Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
10
1030•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$2.19
+1.39%
SN
SNLAF•United States
$1.34
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Seazen Group Ltd is 1.2× the market cap of Sino Land Company Limited. SNLAF trades at a lower P/E than 1030. SNLAF pays a dividend; 1030 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$2.19 | $1.34 |
| Daily Change | 1.39% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 5.29% | — |
| 52-Week High | HK$2.81 | $1.34 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$1.85 | $1.32 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$2.23 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$2.34 | — |
| Beta | 2.31 | 0.51 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.64B | $12.52B |
| Enterprise Value | $75.91B | $-35.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53.14B | $9.51B |
| Shares Outstanding | 7.24B | 9.48B |
| Float | 2.66B | 3.69B |
| Employees | 18,954 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 30.86 | 26.40 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.29 | 1.32 |
| Price / Book | 0.29 | 0.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.16 | -10.71 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.74% | 39.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.41% | 31.07% |
| Return on Equity | 0.38% | 2.20% |
| Return on Assets | 1.55% | 1.08% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.05 |
Growth
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -43.90% | 34.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -27.90% | -15.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 563.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.07 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.57 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 5.74 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.57 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6100 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,783 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1030 | SNLAF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6369.10% | 60.98% |
| % Institutions | 518.80% | 10.19% |
Compare 1030 to peers
Compare SNLAF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.